I can’t appease both sides like Kant,
and blend together disparate extremes
into a carefully designed melange.
How do you do it all so well, Immanuel?
When I can’t appease both sides.
I can’t bring together the extremes
into any sort of cohesion.
I can’t be of both minds.
Seen from one angle or the other
the points of view
have a tendency to break
into static feedback loops
that are consistent and diverging.
It's either one or the other, it has to be.
The same substance flows
in rhetorical routes rendered from the static.
Its persuasive pulse is persistent in step.
Always one above the other!
